需要让TestNG运行我的Spock测试,因为TestNG用于整个系统的其余部分. 由于TestNG支持运行JUnit测试,我试过这个： !DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "http://testng.org/testng-1.0.dtd" suite name="suiteTestName" verbose="1" jun
由于TestNG支持运行JUnit测试,我试过这个：
<!DOCTYPE suite SYSTEM "http://testng.org/testng-1.0.dtd" >
<suite name="suiteTestName" verbose="1" junit="true">
<test name="myTestName">
<classes>
<class name="mypackage.artifact.SomeArtifactSpecification" />
</classes>
</test>
</suite>
所以这实际上完全运行了Groovy的’SomeArtifactSpecification’Spock单元测试.我可以从测试中看到一些I / O,但是因为我在Eclipse中运行,所以我使用调试器来验证所有测试是否正确执行.我的类路径上有TestNG-6.8.7和JUnit-4.10.问题是TestNG似乎并不知道它确实如此！这是最终输出：
=============================================== myTestName Total tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Skips: 0 ===============================================
有谁知道是否有可能让TestNG识别这些测试？
其他详细信息 – 为Bounty添加
在下面的一条评论中,彼得表示这取决于TestNG正在做什么.我尽可能地调查了这一点.似乎Junit和TestNG都调用了Spock的Sputnik类第63行的’run’方法.但是,当直接从JUnit调用时,从JUnit4TestClassReference调用Sputnik.从TestNG调用时,从JUnitCore调用Sputnik.
所以问题仍然存在：如何让TestNG识别Spock的测试输出？如果我要长寿和繁荣,我真的需要知道！似乎答案可能是让TestNG与JUnit4TestClassReference一起运行,或者使用某种类型的聪明包装器来使TestNG这样做……
对于血淋淋的细节,我在下面发布了两个堆栈跟踪.第一个是从TestNG运行,它不起作用,第二个是直接运行Spock而没有TestNG.
来自TestNG的第一个堆栈跟踪：
org.testng.remote.RemoteTestNG at localhost:54288
Thread [main] (Suspended (breakpoint at line 65 in ArtifactManagerSpecification))
ArtifactManagerSpecification.$spock_feature_0_0() line: 65
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method]
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43
Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601
ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeFeatureMethod() line: 285
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).doRunIteration() line: 256
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method]
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43
Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601
ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runIteration(Object[], int) line: 223
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).initializeAndRunIteration(Object[], int) line: 214
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runSimpleFeature() line: 205
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).doRunFeature() line: 199
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method]
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43
Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601
ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runFeature() line: 175
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runFeatures() line: 152
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).doRunSpec() line: 112
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method]
NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57
DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43
Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601
ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runSpec() line: 91
ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).run() line: 82
Sputnik.run(RunNotifier) line: 63
JUnitCore.run(Runner) line: 157
JUnitCore.run(Request) line: 136
JUnit4TestRunner.start(Class, String...) line: 81
JUnit4TestRunner.run(Class, String...) line: 69
TestRunner$1.run() line: 682
TestRunner.runWorkers(List<IWorker<ITestNGMethod>>, String, ListMultiMap<Integer,TestMethodWorker>) line: 1005
TestRunner.privateRunJUnit(XmlTest) line: 713
TestRunner.run() line: 614
SuiteRunner.runTest(TestRunner) line: 334
SuiteRunner.runSequentially() line: 329
SuiteRunner.privateRun() line: 291
SuiteRunner.run() line: 240
SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerMap, XmlSuite) line: 52
SuiteRunnerWorker.run() line: 86
RemoteTestNG(TestNG).runSuitesSequentially(XmlSuite, SuiteRunnerMap, int, String) line: 1224
RemoteTestNG(TestNG).runSuitesLocally() line: 1149
RemoteTestNG(TestNG).run() line: 1057
RemoteTestNG.run() line: 111
RemoteTestNG.initAndRun(String[], CommandLineArgs, RemoteArgs) line: 204
RemoteTestNG.main(String[]) line: 175
第二个堆栈跟踪(有效)直接运行Spock
Thread [main] (Suspended (breakpoint at line 65 in ArtifactManagerSpecification)) ArtifactManagerSpecification.$spock_feature_0_0() line: 65 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601 ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeFeatureMethod() line: 285 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).doRunIteration() line: 256 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601 ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runIteration(Object[], int) line: 223 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).initializeAndRunIteration(Object[], int) line: 214 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runSimpleFeature() line: 205 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).doRunFeature() line: 199 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601 ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runFeature() line: 175 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runFeatures() line: 152 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).doRunSpec() line: 112 NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Method, Object, Object[]) line: not available [native method] NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 57 DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Object, Object[]) line: 43 Method.invoke(Object, Object...) line: 601 ReflectionUtil.invokeMethod(Object, Method, Object...) line: 138 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invokeRaw(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 330 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).invoke(Object, MethodInfo, Object...) line: 311 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).runSpec() line: 91 ParameterizedSpecRunner(BaseSpecRunner).run() line: 82 Sputnik.run(RunNotifier) line: 63 JUnit4TestClassReference(JUnit4TestReference).run(TestExecution) line: 50 TestExecution.run(ITestReference[]) line: 38 RemoteTestRunner.runTests(String[], String, TestExecution) line: 467 RemoteTestRunner.runTests(TestExecution) line: 683 RemoteTestRunner.run() line: 390 RemoteTestRunner.main(String[]) line: 197我进一步调查了这一点,至少我找到了原因.
在下面的org.testng.junit.JUnit4TestMethod中,无法正确解析Spock测试名称.我猜,但我认为Spock使用一种名称修改来支持它允许的好文本方法名称.因此,即使下面的TestNG代码获得了一个方法名称,例如“这是我的测试”,它也无法通过显示的方法解决这个问题.我相信真正的方法名称是：$spock_feature_0_0
private static Method getMethod(Description desc) {
Class<?> c = desc.getTestClass();
String method = desc.getMethodName();
try {
return c.getMethod(method);
} catch (Throwable t) {
Utils.log("JUnit4TestMethod", 2,
"Method '" + method + "' not found in class '" + c.getName() + "': " + t.getMessage());
return null;
}
}
因此,这会在调用c.getMethod(方法)时抛出异常 – 它无法将Spock方法名称解析为类上的实际方法.
似乎真正“搞乱局面”的是上面的代码在此代码中由Junit(org.junit.runner.notification.RunNotifier)调用：
private abstract class SafeNotifier {
void run() {
synchronized (fListeners) {
for (Iterator<RunListener> all= fListeners.iterator(); all.hasNext();)
try {
notifyListener(all.next());
} catch (Exception e) {
all.remove(); // Remove the offending listener first to avoid an infinite loop
fireTestFailure(new Failure(Description.TEST_MECHANISM, e));
}
}
}
这段代码不能安静地删除监听器,而是记录它…