CREATE TABLE lab ( recid serial NOT NULL, cpt_recid integer, ........ CONSTRAINT cs_cpt FOREIGN KEY (cpt_recid) REFERENCES cpt (recid) MATCH SIMPLE ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE RESTRICT, ... );
我遇到的最大问题是如何获取失败的记录,以便我可以在EXCEPTION子句中将它用于将子行从lab移动到一个可接受的键,然后循环返回并从cpt表中删除不必要的记录.
这是(非常错误的)代码:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION h_RemoveDuplicateCPT()
RETURNS void AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
LOOP
BEGIN
DELETE FROM cpt
WHERE recid IN (
SELECT recid
FROM (
SELECT recid,
row_number() over (partition BY cdesc ORDER BY recid) AS rnum
FROM cpt) t
WHERE t.rnum > 1)
RETURNING recid;
IF count = 0 THEN
RETURN;
END IF;
EXCEPTION WHEN foreign_key_violation THEN
RAISE NOTICE 'fixing unique_violation';
RAISE NOTICE 'recid is %' , recid;
END;
END LOOP;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE;
使用
data-modifying CTEs的单个SQL语句可以更有效地执行此操作.
WITH plan AS (
SELECT *
FROM (
SELECT recid, min(recid) OVER (PARTITION BY cdesc) AS master_recid
FROM cpt
) sub
WHERE recid <> master_recid -- ... <> self
)
, upd_lab AS (
UPDATE lab l
SET cpt_recid = p.master_recid -- link to master recid ...
FROM plan p
WHERE l.cpt_recid = p.recid
)
DELETE FROM cpt c
USING plan p
WHERE c.recid = p.recid
RETURNING c.recid;
db<>小提琴here(第11页)
SQL Fiddle(第9.6页)
这应该更快更清洁.循环比较昂贵,异常处理相对更昂贵.
更重要的是,实验室中的引用会自动重定向到cpt中的相应主行,但这不在原始代码中.所以你可以一次删除所有欺骗.
如果愿意,您仍然可以将它包装在plpgsql或SQL函数中.
说明
>在第一个CTE计划中,使用相同的cdesc标识每个分区中的主行.在你的情况下,recid最小的行.
>在第二个CTE upd_lab中,将引用欺骗的所有行重定向到cpt中的主行.
>最后,删除dupes,这不会引发异常,因为依赖行实际上同时链接到剩余的主行.
ON DELETE RESTRICT
所有CTE和语句的主要查询几乎同时在基础表的相同快照上运行.他们没有看到彼此对基础表的影响:
> Delete parent if it’s not referenced by any other child
人们可能期望使用ON DELETE RESTRICT的FK约束来引发异常,因为[per documentation] [3]:
Referential actions other than the
NO ACTIONcheck cannot be deferred,
even if the constraint is declared deferrable.
但是,上面的语句是单个命令,[再次手册] [3]:
A constraint that is not deferrable will be checked immediately after
every command.
大胆强调我的.当然,也适用于限制较少的默认值ON DELETE NO ACTION.
但要警惕写入相同表的并发事务,但这是一个普遍的考虑因素,并非特定于此任务.
一个例外适用于UNIQUE和PRIMARY KEY约束,但这不涉及这种情况:
> Constraint defined DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE is still DEFERRED?
