我有一个带有几个派生类的Base类: class Base {private: long id;public: Base() {} ~Base() {} Base operator = (long temp) { id = temp; return *this; }};template class Cclass Temp1 : public Base {public: Temp1() {} ~Temp1() {} //d
class Base {
private:
long id;
public:
Base() {}
~Base() {}
Base &operator = (long temp) {
id = temp;
return *this;
}
};
template <class C>
class Temp1 : public Base {
public:
Temp1() {}
~Temp1() {}
//do something;
};
template <class C>
class Temp2 : public Base {
public:
Temp2() {}
~ Temp2() {}
//do something;
};
class Executor1 : public Temp1<int> {
public:
Executor1() {}
~Executor1() {}
};
class Executor2 : public Temp2<char> {
public:
Executor2() {}
~Executor2() {}
};
我希望这些类支持operator =.
例如:
int main()
{
long id1 = 0x00001111, id2 = 0x00002222;
Executor1 exec1;
Executor2 exec2;
exec1 = id1; //exec2.id = id1;
exec2 = id2; //exec2.id = id2;
}
我在Base中定义operator =,其声明为Base& operator =(long);.
但是有一个问题显然是=无法派生类.所以我必须定义operator =完全对每个Executor做同样的事情.
如何以更好的方式在Base中处理这种情况?
您必须将= -operator拉入类的范围:class Base
{
public:
long id;
Base& operator=(long id)
{
this->id = id;
return *this;
}
};
class Temp2
: public Base
{
public:
using Base::operator=;
};
你必须将operator =拉入范围,因为隐式生成的复制操作符= Temp2隐藏了operator = of Base.从@Angew的评论中得到了这个暗示.
